In the 48 hours in which Trump switched on Zelensky

Cnn
–

When the prerequisite relationship between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky distorted them apart on Wednesday, there was a question that remained among ally of both men.

Trump shot an angry message on his social media platform and described Zelensky as a “dictator without elections” and accused him of exemplifying the United States hundreds of billions of dollars to go into a war that is not gained could. “”

It became a day -long series of mockery that Trump strengthened during a speech on Wednesday evening in Miami, where he explained: “Zelensky was better moving faster. He will no longer have a country. ”

Both accusations drew Moscow’s own ironic conversation topics about the war and the Ukrainian president, who explained war law at the beginning of Russia invasion, which prevented planned elections.

Trump’s post was hardly an isolated attack. For years, Trump has been skeptical for years, questioned his decisions and in an episode that was famous for the first time Trump’s first elevation-to create an investigation by his then rival Joe Biden.

Trump has teamed up to interweave his criticism of bidges and Zelensky, which was proposed on Wednesday evening that the Ukrainian president stood in a “sauce train” with support during the Biden administration.

“If you had had administration for another year (bidens),” said Trump on Wednesday evening, “you would have been in the Second World War and it won’t happen now.”

Recently, however, Trump’s helpers have monitored the public statements of Zelensky – in particular his criticism of the USA without Ukraine from discussions with Russian officials in Saudi Arabia this week – with increasing agitation.

Her frustration has grown before Wednesday, said sources. But it cooked by after Zelensky said reporters in his office in Kyiv that Trump lived in a “network of disinformation”.

Trump told the adjutant privately, who were together in Florida that he wanted to answer directly, which led to his social post of truth, said an official trip with Trump. He delivered the diplomatic rocket on the way to his golf club in Miami and expanded his statements from an audience of hundreds of hundreds at the evening investment conference in Miami, which were sponsored by the sovereign WEALTH Fund of Saudi Arabia, which previously conversations between us a week organized and Russian officials.

“It is a frustration. There is a strong and legitimate feeling that this brutal war has to stop and that this path is reduced by Zelensky’s public statements, ”a second official from the White House told CNN.

According to Zelensky, the end of the war stipulates that Trump looks like that what Russia has asked. The members of the Trump government have already excluded NATO membership for Kyiv and said that US troops would not help to guarantee Ukraine’s security after the war.

For these reasons, he says he can’t help but comment.

For months, Zelensky had tried carefully to avoid a full break with his spirited new counterpart in Washington. In the weeks before the election of last year, he arranged a meeting to dispel some of the skepticism of the then GOP candidate compared to the US participation in the war.

The men appeared at the beginning of the discussion in the Trump Tower in Manhattan to demonstrate their willingness to get along. Trump said he had a “very good relationship” with the Ukrainian leader – but he also enjoyed a “very good relationship” with his opponent in Moscow, Vladimir Putin.

“I hope we have more good relationships,” said Zelensky.

“But you know it takes two to tango,” replied Trump.

At that time, the exchange has hardly registered. Five months later, it seems to say the remarkable crack that arises when Trump wants to sit down with Putin in Saudi Arabia.

Only a few foreign guides were immune to Trump’s mood swings, which led to overseas during his first term abroad, the phone calls ended abruptly when Trump stopped, and the imposition of hard new tariffs.

So far, however, Trump’s frustrations did not seem to signal such wholesale in American foreign policy, away from the long -time allies of the United States in Europe and the Kremlin.

Many of Trump’s allies said Zelensky should have seen Trump’s anger.

“The idea that Zelensky will change the opinion of the President by having him in public media. Everyone who knows the president will tell them that this is a cruel opportunity to deal with this administration,” Vance told The Daily Mail.

In the explanation of Trump’s striking public statements, officials from the White House insisted that his preselection-in is the Time-Nur goal of ending the three-year conflict in Ukraine, of which he believes that he is extremely has been managed wrong.

To survive after years of grinding conflicts, be it long overdue, on a settlement against the war. Trump himself appeared in the exact contours of the settlement that ended the war almost agnostically: “I don’t care so much about something else than I want to stop having killed millions of people,” he said last week.

But how he achieves this goal while giving up Zelensky and aligning himself with Russian topics of conversation is not clear.

Trump’s Republican allies in Washington proposed on Wednesday that the president could have a great plan in mind.

“What I support is a peaceful result and leads to Ukraine,” said John Thune, the majority leader of the Senate when he was asked whether he was concerned about the rhetoric of the President about Ukraine. Thune said he believed that Trump and his team work to achieve peace, and “at the moment you have to give them some space.”

Senator Kevin Cramer, a Republican from North Dakota, said Trump was “always positioned for something” and added that he suspected that Trump was “positioned for a negotiation with Putin through his comments.

Nevertheless, Trump requires a buy-in at Zelensky if a negotiated end of the conflict is successful. And if he is serious to keep American troops away from the conflict, he has to need European allies to take their own peace forces – a step that some nations have already offered.

Some Trump consultants and allies see a strategy in unrest. A Trump loyalist who has spoken to the President in Florida in the past few days said that a reason for Trump’s out in Ukraine was to get Europe to pony to defend Ukraine.

“See, there is a method for madness,” said the person, pointing to a report that Denmark had obliged to increase expenses for weapons.

A Trump consultant repeated this feeling on Wednesday and said CNN: “If other European countries are half as reaction as Denmark, that’s a massive victory.”

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who held close relationships with Trump during his first term, contradicted the majority of Trump’s claims, but said that his former counterpart had held a larger point.

“When will we stop Europeans to be scandalized via Donald Trump and to help him end this war?” Johnson wrote. “Of course, Ukraine did not start the war. You could just as well say that America attacked Japan in Pearl Harbor. Of course, a country that undermines a violent invasion should not perform any elections. There were no general elections in Great Britain from 1935 to 1945. Of course, Zelenskyy’s ratings is not 4%. They are actually about the same as Trump. ”

“Trump’s statements should not be historically correct, but should handle the Europeans into practice,” he continued.

In fact, hastily arranged conferences of European leaders in Paris organized this week organized by French President Emmanuel Macron that Trump’s words were taken very seriously.

“Russia is an existential threat to Europeans,” said Macron in an interview with French regional newspapers. “Don’t think that the unthinkable cannot happen, including the worst.”

At the same time, Macron Trump does not quite give up. He will be a meeting in Washington next week, as will the British Prime Minister Keir Starrer, who said he was ready to send troops as peace troops in Ukraine.

Both men spoke to Zelensky on Wednesday after Trump’s insults.

“The Prime Minister expressed his support for President Zelenskyy as a democratically elected leader of Ukraine and said it was absolutely reasonable to suspend the elections during the war, as the United Kingdom did during the Second World War,” said Downing Street afterwards.

Trump is increasingly involved in the role of the pencil – regardless of the costs – with a view to the frayed western alliances and the prerequisite for US foreign policy.

“We successfully negotiate an end to war with Russia, which everyone admits that only Trump will be able,” said Trump on Wednesday evening and spoke again and again in the third person.

“We can do it in the Trump administration. I think Putin even admitted that. ”