Will drivers get money back? – NBC New York

Since the future of traffic jam prices in New York City is unsure, at least one neighboring legislator takes the opportunity to request a refund for drivers who have paid tribute in the past few weeks.

New Jersey Rep. Josh Gotheimer, a Democrat, made an explanation in which he took the support of the traffic jam back a day after the US Transport Ministry of Transport’s Ministry of Transport, in which he “insisted” that New York repaid the driver.

“If New York insisted on keeping the cameras in place, you should be ready to reimburse every Jersey commuters for the toll fees,” said Gotheimer. Legendary mismanagement. “

The legislator of the garden state, a convinced critic of the toll, also demanded an apology from Governor Kathy Hochul, “because they claimed that they were not forced to come to New York”.

Meanwhile, the governor spent the end of her week in Washington, DC, where her spokesman confirmed that Hochul scored President Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

“The governor and the president had an open, open conversation about New York’s main priorities, including road prices, immigration, infrastructure, economic development, energy, offshore wind and nuclear power,” said the spokesman in a explanation.

After the Trump administration’s lawsuit, the MTA said that it would take measures against the withdrawal of her approval for backlogs in court.

Can the point end the congestion prices one -sided?

The letter from the Ministry of Transport indicates that you withdraw the support for the toll plan, but have not given a date to which the pilot program would “end” it. While the department made the approval available for the pilot program, the congestion prices are operated by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

In a statement, the chairman and CEO of MTA said Janno Lieber that the agency had filed a lawsuit before a federal court to ensure that the plan remains.

“It is mystifying that after four years and 4,000 pages with nationwide environmental examination and barely three months after the final approval for the congestion aid program, the course would try to reverse the course,” added the chairman.

The lawsuit claim that the efforts of the Trump administration are “illegal” to terminate the congestion prices and that the toll system declares status quo.

“The status quo is that the congestion prices are continued, and if the plaintiffs continue to operate the program according to the New Yorker,” says the Federal Court Challenge.

NYC Compotroller and candidate for mayor Brad Lander said that his office had examined “all available options” to reverse the decision of the Trump administration to stop the traffic jam prices.

Which projects could be influenced by an end of the congestion prices?

On January 10th, days after the controversy started, the MTA chairman and CEO Janno preferred to buy 265 electric buses as the first project that was “activated” by traffic jam prices. The buses were bought in the first week and are expected to be in circulation later this year in the city.

Another major project that could be influenced by the possible end of the traffic jam prices is the second phase of the Second Avenue U -Bahn extension. In the days before the toll was implemented, the MTA issued an application for suggestions from companies that were able to design and build up the expansion of the Q line between 96 and 125th streets, reported an independent news room.

When the project was “carried out” last summer, NBC New York reported that the break would have an impact on projects to add elevators and ramps for at least 18 U -Bahn stations and signals for C&F lines in Brooklyn and To improve manhattan.

In the letter, Duffy acknowledges that an end to the congestion prices “of the transit agency of the financing can be withdrawn, but any dependency on this financing current was not appropriate because FHWA only approved a” pilot project “.”