The Harem of Elon Muschus

Paternity is great in the Maga fantasy: Tucker Carlson was the president as a disciplinary father who destroyed the country’s decline – “When dad comes home, you know what he says?” Asked Carlson. “‘You were a bad girl, you were a bad little girl and get a strong beating.” A popular brand of goods with Trump topics also shows the slogan Daddy home. Trump’s supporters tend to imagine that he fulfills a conservative version of paternity, in which the role is associated with rule and authoritarian discipline. But the Republican Party now has a completely different vision of fatherhood, with the kind permission of Elon Musk.

According to a current Wall Street Journal Report, Musk constantly scans the horizon for new potential mothers for his children, whereby everything from X interactions and DMS to huge cash incentives are used to arrange potential incubators that they need to sign right-wing payment agreements with non-agreement clauses. As a result, Musk has an unknown number of children who are probably already publicly known far above the 14, and he has not shown an obvious intention not to sow his seed anymore. But maybe more interesting than the presence of contracts between musk and its Hariem of mothers is the obvious lack of traditional family ties. He only seems to recognize a few, if at all, bonds of real duty and responsibility among family members, let alone bonds in care or love. Musk seems to have traditional family relationships with mere financial agreements and to undermine the long -term conservative agreement on the importance of the family.

After all, there is a difference between the Pro Natalist and the Pro family. Musk is now notorious for his interest in increasing the birth rate, which seems to be powered by his conviction that a catastrophic collapse of the world’s population is imminent, and through his view that intelligent people should breed more in particular. (“He really wants clever people to have children,” said Shivon Zilis, Musks the most preferred concubine, a biographer.) His Eugenic Bent makes him the most prominent member of the techno-libertarian wing of the pro-natalist movement, which aims at breeding genetically superior offspring, and that in addition to the traditionist approach of professionals Approaches to the existence. The gap in movement is real: tech against trad, future versus past, reproduction versus family. And although the trads mostly come from the conservative Christian basis that the Republican party once encouraged, it is the technical people like Musk who have more resources and power to market their ideology.

Read: Why the left should hug pro-natalism

But even eager fans of Musk’s reproductive philosophy cannot replace the extent of his bloodlining empire, since Musk is particularly well positioned to use money to finance and structure his preferred family arrangements, which effectively reduces these relationships to a vulgar cash nexus. Musk’s latest wife, the conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair, told The Wall Street Journal‘S Dana Mattioli that Musk had offered her a lump sum of 15 million US dollars and $ 100,000 per month for the cost of living -if she were willing to sign a contract where she would keep her arrangement secret. Mattioli reported that this was familiar with Musk’s habits that this is a well-established practice for the billionaire, the women financially threatened if they hire a lawyer or go public, Musk has ended his proposed payment of $ 15 million and lowered their recurring payments to $ 40,000 per month.

“The time of reducing payments from him is agreed with disagreements about test and gag orders,” said Dror Bikel, one of St. Clair’s lawyers, said to Mattioli and added that “the only conclusion we can draw is that the money is armed.” Money seems to be the only way to convince people who are not intimate with him and whose preferences and needs are not of great importance for him. The fatherhood for musk ends with conception, with the exception of the ongoing payments. There is no recognizable feeling of mutual duty or responsibility between musk and his children or between the musk and the mothers of his children and no expectation of growth in such ties or fulfillment in them: A musk helper said to St. Clair that Zilis “avoids and out of the way” to find satisfaction “, and that Grimes, another mother of Musk, does not” find it “.

This is not surprising – the family values ​​of Musk seem to have been replaced similarly by the usual ties of family love. According to Mattioli, Musk, which St. Clair “Harem Drama” described by giving some of the mothers of his babies such as Zilis, a special status, both financially and socially, while others, such as St. Clair, have difficulty reacting to their texts or in a grime case with their despiverat X posts. He is also actively interested in some of his children’s and x Æ a-xii, his toddler son with Grimes, whom he contains public appearances and state events-more than others. He refused to have his name in the birth certificate of St. Clair’s son and is alienated by his daughter Vivian. Although earlier generations of conservatives have referred to the family as “port in a heartless world”, the relationship between Musk and his children and their mothers seem to be defined by a competition infected by capitalists. Musk’s “whole world is as a meritocracy,” said the Musk Adjutant St. Clair, in which “people who do a good job”.

Musk is rich enough to continue his pro-natalistic project for an indefinite period, and the world is full of women of childbearing age who could use $ 15 million. Musk offspring can one day inherit the earth. But beforehand, Musk can inherit the Republican Party he bought and paid for, and thus reorganize the traditional thinking of the right about the concept of the family. The old days are over, replaced by something worse.