All six charges by Lucas Paqueta are available why West Ham is concerned and how the process is decided as a FA

After nine months of FA investigations, the West Ham playmaker Paqueta was officially charged in May last year.

Now, 10 months later, Hammers Ace Paqueta will finally be on trial on Monday.

It means that the game in Everton could be the last for West Ham or anyone this weekend.

The FA urges Paqueta to obtain a lifelong ban if it is found guilty.

The 27-year-old has always vehemently maintained his innocence.

Last week Paqueta said that he would not rest until he clarified his name.

West Ham Ace Paqueta against music after 19 months

Since then, it has been announced that Paqueta had called a legal large weapon into the corner against the FA.

There was incessant reporting on the case, not everything exactly.

Here Hammers News explains all the facts about the case before the legal proceedings, which the FA can be heard for three weeks from Monday – two of them about the international break.

The allegations around the Paqueta Center for four bookings were played for West Ham.

But the Brazil midfielder actually has six charges.

Here we fully look at you why West Ham is concerned and how the process as a FA penetrates to ban the mercury talent for life.

What are the FA’s plants against West Ham -Star Paqueta?

Lucas Paqueta was officially charged with misconduct in relation to alleged violations of the FA rules E5 and F3.

The record of West Ham in the amount of 51 million Aston Villa on March 12, 2023; Leeds United on May 21, 2023; and AFC Bournemouth on August 12, 2023.

The FA is claimed that Paqueta directly tried to influence the progress, behavior or another aspect or another aspect or another aspect or the occurrence in these matches by deliberately receiving a card from the referee in order to influence the competition in order to influence the betting market so that one or more people benefit from bets.

Video recordings of these bookings were often repeated on social media and will be part of the FA’s evidence for an independent panel with three people.

In addition to these four charges, Paqueta was also charged with two violations of the FA rule F3 in relation to alleged failures, which comply with the F2 rule F2.

What are FA rule F2 and F3?

• FA rule F2: This rule allows the FA, a participant (player, coach, club officer, etc.) to request questions to answer questions, provide documents, information or other materials after a reasonable notification.
• Fa Rule F3:This rule defines misconduct as a violation, including non -compliance with a requirement in accordance with FA rule F2.

Why are West Ham concerned about the Paqueta case?

From the beginning, West Ham steadily stood behind her best paid player.

Despite the allegations that Paquetas proposed to Manchester City, which Cole Palmer would have led to the hammers, as has been confirmed by the former boss David Moyes and deputy chairman Karren Brady since then.

There were claims that Paqueta would sue the FA for an income loss about this move. But that will depend on the fact that it will be clarified.

Since the official accusations, the FA has stated that they will not be given any further comment until this case.

West Ham was also quite narrow and confirmed that the trial version begins on Monday.

There were reports that the Hammers board was concerned about the result of the case.

For West Ham, Paqueta is not only an important player, but also an advantage that has an official book value of 20 million GBP.

This is money that West Ham is currently urgently needed to rebuild the horizon against the background of the PSR restrictions with 80 million pounds.

Senior Hammers Sources recently announced mail sports that they are not confident of having a victory because they believe that the chances against them and their players are stacked.

Fears of the result of the case arise from the way the process is heard.

West Ham Insiders said last week that they could see the process as a “savage” and that it could “very false” Paquetas career on a potential ’51 percent “culprit judgment”.

How is the Paqueta attempt decided?

West Ham’s greatest concern revolves around the standard of evidence for the independent three-person committee, which is based on a “balance of probabilities”.

This is the case in all cases of civil law – the umbrella under which the Paqueta process falls.

It is very different from the stricter threshold “undoubtedly doubt” that is used in criminal proceedings.

In Laiens, the FA only has to prove that it is more likely that Paqueta will deal with the spot fixation by deliberately booking to influence the betting markets during this West Ham games.

According to the FA rules, the civil standard of the “equilibrium balance sheet” is used in cases by their supervisory authorities.

For West Ham, the FA is also for a lifelong ban after spending many months to collect and study evidence.

Paqueta remains clear that he did not do anything wrong.

West Ham and the player will find out early enough.