close
close
BGT, Aus vs India, 2nd Test – Mitchell Starc uses his favorite combination to boost Australia

It was the roar. Mitchell Starc has taken many wickets throughout his successful career, but it seemed like this one held a little more significance than many others. The first delivery bounced into Yashasvi Jaiswal’s pad as the left-hander bowled over and for the third time in his career Starc had a wicket with the first ball of a Test match.
The last time a wicket fell on the opening toss of a men’s Test was when Starc extracted Rory Burns’ leg stump with the opening ball of the 2021-22 Ashes at the Gabba. That too brought wild celebrations, but in the context of this game, Jaiswal’s wicket was a very special moment. The noise from a not-yet-full Adelaide Oval as he departed was impressive.
Much was said and written about Australia’s performance both during and after the first Test; Much of it was fair and balanced – it was a defeat of rare proportions on home soil – but there were extreme views and the usual collection of hot takes. Alex Carey spoke of some surprise at the reaction, Nathan Lyon said he found parts of it humorous. But the bottom line is that Australia needed a quick response.
So they couldn’t have asked for a better start than removing the batsman who had scored 161 in the second innings in Perth. Jaiswal had shown his willingness to engage in a duel by suggesting to Starc that he was not bowling fast enough, although in the subsequent press conference he spoke of his respect for Starc and his joy at meeting him. However, he had started Perth with a duck courtesy of Starc before making his presence felt. It’s shaping up to be one of the series’ battles.

For a short time after the early breakthrough, it seemed as if Australia were losing it. Scott Boland denied himself a first-ball wicket in his first home Tests in two years when he dismissed KL Rahul after going over the boundary – in a bizarre twist, Snicko suggested there was no nick despite the batter before the No-ball call began to run. Later in the same over, Usman Khawaja dropped a catch at first slip, giving Rahul a second life.

India reached 69 for 1 in the final half hour of the session when Starc returned, deflected Rahul into the crease and then got Virat Kohli to hit a rising throw to second slip, similar to his dismissal in the first innings in Perth. Both Kohli and Starc love Adelaide Oval but this time it was the latter who got the honor. When Boland dismissed Shubman Gill lbw with a full toss, India were 81 for 4 at lunch break.

On the one hand it was no surprise that Starc was Australia’s main man, but on the other hand it went against the grain. He has a phenomenal record in pink-ball Tests – at the end of the innings it was 72 wickets at 17.81, including 4 for 53 in the corresponding Test in 2020-21 – but overall it has been more of a struggle against India in Tests: before Today he had 51 wickets at 38.72 and never took more than five in a game. They are easily the opponents he has been least productive against.

So in a sense he used one of his favorite combinations – Adelaide and the pink ball – to overcome a more stubborn obstacle. He has had excellent rhythm this season, even though he took a few penalties in India’s big second innings in the first Test. “I said in Perth last week that I thought he looked better than he has in a long time,” continued Ricky Ponting Channel 7.

Midway through the second session, Starc came back for the third time that day and struck a spell in his first over, catching R Ashwin lbw with a full toss that swung backwards (and also did some damage to Ashwin’s foot). The movement was on display again as he ripped a shot through Harshit Rana as he continued to show significant form with a 39 overs old ball.

“Ash’s dismissal was a very good example of why he is so effective with the pink ball,” India assistant coach Ryan ten Doeschate said. “He is someone who presents the seam well. He obviously uses the other ball very well when setting up batters. If the ball swings back to some degree – a lesser degree – batters can generally figure it out. But if you guess.” On both sides, it makes him far more effective.

When Starc completed India’s innings by ending Nitesh Kumar Reddy’s fierce counter-attack, it gave him a new career best of 6 for 48. This surpassed the 6 for 50 he made against Sri Lanka in Galle in 2016, in a nice twist that The result was that he had taken a wicket with the first ball of a Test for the first time. With his Jaiswal wicket, Starc became the second bowler to achieve this feat three times, after Pedro Collins, who has the wonderfully bizarre distinction of removing the same batsman – Bangladesh’s Hannan Sarkar – each time.

Also notable was that Starc’s best analysis came in his 91st Test. Only two frontline bowlers have reached a new high in terms of games played later in their careers: James Anderson in his 128th game and Glenn McGrath in his 103rd game.

But while 180 all out looked like a job well done, here we were in Perth a few weeks ago when India were bowled out for 150 and Australia had the final session ahead of them. That didn’t go well for the hosts and they had to deal not only with Jasprit Bumrah but also with the night session.

The result was as good as anyone could have hoped. Usman Khawaja got Bumrah to slip – meaning his form remains to be seen – but the inexperienced Nathan McSweeney in his adopted hometown and the under-pressure Marnus Labuschagne made it to the stumps.

McSweeney, dropped for 3 by Rishabh Pant, had been egged on by Rana in the early stages of his innings, seemingly luring him into a maelstrom that was not far from being drawn out, but he held on beyond that His composure is impressive, even when the floodlights flash twice in quick succession. As the final half-hour approached, McSweeney took on Reddy one after the other, drawing the lively Rana to the next in the closing moments.

A day that started with cheers for Starc ended with cheers for a local star who went to the trouble of making sure Starc’s work wasn’t in vain. Australia needed a good day; They had an excellent one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *