David Marcus: Sorry Dems, literally nobody believes that married women cannot get any ID cards

The most recent ridiculous lie of the Democrats about how the Republicans drive the country into fascism, and it is a fool. This time we should believe that Trump and the GOP married women prohibit women from voting.

Spoiler alarm: You are not.

Real ID period for travelers, an access of the federal government who quickly approaches

MP Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., And others went to video this week to raise the nonsensical and logically tortured claim and said: “The so-called” Save Act “of the Republicans blocks almost 70 million women from registration to vote because they have changed their name after marriage.”

Here is what the failed glass end of Breaker Hillary Clinton had to say: “The house has just passed the voting deduction millions of times for the suppression of the Republican voters, including 69 million women whose married names do not match their birth certificates.”

Miami, Florida, Miami International Airport, safety provision of the TSA -Checkpoint, Real ID sign. (Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

The law on the authorization (Safeguard American Voter Voter Feuribility) (Save) requires a Prof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. The acceptable documents for the proof of citizenship include: a real ID-compliant driver’s license, a valid US pass and a military ID.

You would think that the requirement of driving license would be simple enough, but again the blue-state democrats have reinforced this when they insisted that illegal immigrants whose supporting documents could not be checked to give the driver’s licenses. Now the rest of us have to receive an additional review for our leaders’ licenses so that they can differ from those who are distributed to illegal foreigners like sweets.

Therefore, the Democrats seriously suggest that married women in our country are almost unable to receive verified identification, and are therefore disenfranchised by Republicans, presumably when they turn their handlebars and kick some puppies.

I would like to ask rep. Swalwell whether married women are not able to get IDs like a driver’s license, why is there an almost endless line of cars in front of me in school collection?

In addition, I will understand that married women travel abroad quite regularly. If you can’t get a passport, how does that happen? Inplangant border officials their husbands?

… There are about 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken the surname of their spouse, which means that there are 70 million Americans who know a damn well how easily they can get a valid ID.

In fact, if there are some unsolvable problems that prevent married women from gaining an ID, we should fix it. But since nobody had ever heard of this “main problem” until the Republicans raised a voter -ID law, it is suspicious.

This applies in particular, since up to 80% of the Americans support the valid ID to choose, but instead of honoring the will of the people, the left is again calculated in the light identity policy.

You have to pass it on to the Democrats. If you stick to a message, you will start immediately with the subtlety of a heavenly competition, as in the last month, at the same time as the subtlety of a sky writer when you all started to curse Andrew Dice Clay one day.

As cosmic stupid and demonstrably incorrect it is, this claim that married women are constantly influenced or are clearly disadvantaged by the law about the voters ID is for a very dangerous course that the Democrats run again and again.

According to the Democrats, we cannot have safer roads because minorities or the poor are arrested more often, we cannot protect women in sports, as this violates transit rights and we cannot secure the coordination because married women do not know how to get IDS.

This is all “different effects of absurdity”. If there is a non-white, not in a row, non-CIS person who faces a negative consequence of legislation, the whole thing must be danced.

In the meantime, Democrats are driving politics such as student debt that the Americans who never went to college clearly disadvantage, but in this case the discrimination is somehow illuminated.

Click here to find more opinion from FOX News

The last nail in the coffin of this crazy idea that the GOP all wants to dismissed with “woman”, before her name or, in the opinion of the Democrats, is his name that married women tend to be republicans in their vote.

In fact, the latest surveys have shown that the Republicans and Trump had won even more with full voter participation in 2024. Why would the GOP want to leave these voices on the table for everything in the world?

Click here to get the FOX News app

Ultimately, what the Democrats have here is a reality problem. As Swalwell emphasized, there are about 70 million married women in the United States who may have taken the surname of their spouse, which means that there are 70 million Americans who know damn well how easily they can get a valid ID.

So go out and voice, married women. There is literally nothing that stops you.

Click here to read more from David Marcus