The San Francisco planning department presented a plan on Thursday to expand San Francisco tens of thousands of houses by increasing the height and density boundaries in large parts of the city.
The “family zoning plan” largely focuses on the Westside of the city, where it imagines, a larger, denser living space.
For the mayor Daniel Lurie, this was a political statement with some risk: he was pleased with the pro-development Yimby groups who did not support his candidacy and possibly irritate the population in Westside in the neighborhood in Westside.
The city is commissioned by the state to build 82,000 residential units by 2031, and the city’s upzoning plan was first initiated in 2023 under the former mayor London Rasse in order to meet this requirement. In addition to the units approved under current zoning, the proposed changes would take 36,000 units.
The consequences of not having met government requirements could be bad, but the housing construction raised a distant back seat during Lurie’s mayor campaign on public security, road conditions and accountability. It was the reigning mayor in London Rasse that ran urban topics and received the notes of organizations such as SF Yimby and Housing Action Coalition.
In a voter guide of Neighborhoods United (a coalition of neighborhood groups that opposes upzoning in relation to the housing platforms of the mayor candidates, Lurie was against the “Ceiling -upzoning plan of the city” and the perspective that the state apartment element is “unreachable” and “counterproductive”. Public comments developed by candidates.
In the meantime, he accepted a different liability on his campaign website and promised Rezone to make the state -sought residential element.
In a pleasant surprise for pro-housing organizations after being in room 200, Lurie takes a pro-upzoning line.
“It’s brave, isn’t it?” Said District 7 Supervisor Myrna Melgar, who quickly pointed out that many voters in Lurie’s basis (and their own district) have expressed hostility to the city’s upzoning destinations. The neighborhoods that disrupt the zone changes almost exclusively overlap with Lurie’s base.
“He gets it. Sometimes they do the right thing in politics, even if some people who have supported them may not completely agree with them,” said Senator Scott Wiener. “This is called leadership. The mayor shows that here.”
The new plan suggests higher altitude boundaries in parts of certain corridors such as Polk Street (six to 25 floors), Geary Boulevard (six to 49 floors) and van Ness Avenue (six to 65 floors). In addition, practically all residential areas on the west side – which over the districts 1, 4, 7 and 8 – would be scrapped. In other words, these areas have “density decline”, which means that the number of units contained in a package would not give a limit, provided they fit into the altitude limit.
The move has already annoyed some residents and housing groups in the neighborhood that oppose the upzoning plan. Neighborhoods United described the plan as “excess” and “unrealistic”.
“The London breed has lost because it hugged this agenda.
The new map of the zoning changes effectively amazes a predecessor card from February 2024, which was published under breed. On the whole, it will influence the wealthier and well -equipped districts of the city that have recorded little development in recent decades.
“San Francisco should be a city with space for more families, more workers and more dreams. Our administration would like to build enough living space for the next generation of San Franciscans so that children who grow up here have the same opportunity to raise their own children here,” wrote Lurie in a statement. “This family zoning plan will help us do this.”
While the move has annoyed some, the implementation of changes to achieve the 82,000 units of apartment destinations is a state requirement. The city would not risk that the city loses ten to hundreds of millions of dollars at state funds or loses the ability to control local zoning rules. It would also open the city to legal disputes; The city of Lafayette is currently being sued
“Anyone who would be the mayor had to get involved with aggressive upzoning,” said Eric Kingbury, former Breed campaign manager. “This is something that every single candidate has to do, regardless of which attitude he has taken during the campaign.”
The mayor recognized this risk. “The state gave us a clear mandate to build more living space,” wrote Lurie, “with real consequences if we don’t.”
Additional reporting from Joe Eskenazi.
(Tagstotranslate) Daniel Lurie