Released Massachusetts that publish immigrants who are charged with violent crimes, as the “border quota” from Trump claims?

It was a month since Tom Homan, the “Grenzzar of the Trump government “Bring hell to Boston.”

“You are not a police commissioner. Take the badge of your chest. Put it into your desk drawer,” Homan told the audience and aimed at the police commissioner of Boston, Michael Cox, and accused him of releasing immigrants who are charged with violent crimes in the community.

WBZ-TV decided to enter the press releases of the immigration and customs authority (ICE) in Massachusetts to determine whether violent criminals are really released by Cox or other law enforcement authorities.

After WBZ checked every press release from January to the present day, he found only one who said that the police in Boston released someone looking for ICE. All other publications said that individuals were released from ice from ice from ice.

Measure. Law prevents the police from enforcing ice liability

Massachusett’s law prevents law enforcement from being based exclusively on their immigration status.

In 2017, the Supreme Court of Massachusetts decided in a case called Lunn v. Commonwealth: “The law of Massachusetts does not give the officials of Massachusett’s court to the arrest and attitude of a person exclusively from the basis of a state civil migration facility, about the time that is otherwise lacking from state custody.”

This means that the Sheriff departments cannot keep anyone after the deposit, even if they are searched for. Sheriffs who want to work with ice to say that their hands are bound.

“It is very frustrating for me to know that I have a drug dealer or a violent perpetrator, I call ice cream and you are like a few situations, I can’t get there for a few hours. I can’t keep them at the moment,” said Sheriff Lewis Evangelidis from Worcester County.

At the same time, Evangelidis says that his prison has risen to an increase in the ice of the ice on occupants.

“We saw that the prisoners have tripled three times in the past three years. We were in the 1930s a few years ago. We crossed 100 over 100 in 2024. For me, this means that there are more people in the Commonwealth,” he said.

Suspect released against deposit

Tom Homan said that he expressly counted “9 children’s rapists who were in prison in Massachusetts” who were released into the community before they were released from ICE. WBZ decided to deal with the deposit for some of these cases.

Take Jose Fernando-Perez, who was arrested by ICE in Framingham in February. According to a press release from ICE, the Supreme Court of Essex County in Salem charged in August 2022 for three rapes of a child and three cases of severe rape of a child. WBZ called the court and found that he published a deposit of 7,500 US dollars and was released with a residence order in October 2022.

Stivenson Omar Perez-Ajtzalan was charged before the Lawrence district court, who was charged on December 20, 2024 due to the severe rape of a child with a ten-year difference. WBZ learned that he published his 7500 dollar deposit and was published with a GPS monitoring device. He was arrested by ice in January.

Juan Alberto Rodezno-Marin was charged in March 2023 in the Supreme Court of Middlesex due to indecent assault and battery in one person over 15, assault and battery with a dangerous weapon, masked armed robbery and attack on rape. It was released in December 2024 with a GPS monitoring device for personal knowledge and arrested by ICE in January.

In the past six months, Worcester County’s prison had two occupants that were charged for rape of children who were set with a deposit of 500 US dollars. They were picked up by ice.

Two other inmates were charged with cocaine and fentanyl trade with deposit of 500 and 4,000 US dollars. Both were searched for ice cream and equipped from the ice before ice arrived.

“Most people would not believe that this is an appropriate deposit,” said Evangelidis.

How deposit is set

Stephen Roth, a criminal defense and immigration lawyer, says that these deposits are determined by the judges to assure someone in court that someone does not ensure that someone will remain custody.

“There are this list of criteria that you go through to determine whether the deposit should be determined and the immigration status is none of these categories,” said Roth.

The public prosecutor can also apply for a hearing on dangerousness to keep a defendant behind bars. Lawyer Jennifer Roman, a legal analyst with WBZ, says that custody is reserved for the most severe cases on the whole path according to the court proceedings.

“Above all, they focus on ensuring the security of the public and at the same time minimizing the defendant’s restrictions or restrictions,” said Roman.

WBZ learned that Jose Fernando-Perez and Juan Alberto Rodezno-Marin had both hearings with dangerous hearings, and served some prison terms before they were released under the conditions in court. Stivenson Omar Perez-Ajtzalan, only 19 years old, had no hearing about dangerousness.

Evangelidis now Supports an invoice Submitted by two Republican legislators who would enable him to keep occupants from ice for another 36 hours. In addition, the judges are asked to take the immigration status into account when setting the deposit.

“I think immigration is a big factor for whether people will voluntarily return to court,” said Evangelidis.

If you have a question in which we would like to examine, please send an e -mail to [email protected].