Switch to the Foreign Ministry Sparks Feury Theeswake from Beijing via Taiwanese independence

Hong Kong
Cnn
–

China accused the Trump management of the “serious regression” in his position in Taiwan after the Foreign Ministry removed a line from its website that the United States does not support the independence of Taiwan.

In a “routine” podium for the online fact sheet about US relationships with Taiwan last week, the Foreign Ministry let the expression “We do not support Taiwan independence” -a position that has long been held by Washington.

The change was welcomed by Taipei, but triggered one of the strongest puppets from Beijing since Donald Trump returned to the White House. China’s governing Communist Party claims the self -governing democracy as a own territory and has sworn to take control of the island if necessary.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs asked the United States on Monday to “correct its mistakes immediately”, or risk “further serious damage” to relationships between China and the USA, which are tested again by returning Trump’s “America First” Policy Policy be tested again. .

“The revision of the list of facts in US-Taiwanese relationships by the US State Department is a serious regression in its attitude to Taiwan. A regular press conference.

“This is further proof that the United States stubbornly adheres to the incorrect politics of the use of Taiwan for the containment of China. We ask the United States to correct its mistakes immediately, ”added Guo and warned Washington to treat the Taiwan problem with” extreme caution “.

Analysts said that the Chinese leaders were particularly concerned about Trump’s new foreign policy team attitude towards Taiwan, the reddish red lines for Beijing.

Trump’s second official cabinet is stacked with prominent China Hawks, including Foreign Minister Marco Rubio.

Rubio was a steadfast supporter of Taiwan. The former senator previously pushed a number of legal provisions to strengthen the relationships between Washington and Taipei, including quick sales of the US weapons to the island.

In a statement to CNN, the Foreign Ministry described the wording change as part of a standard update.

“Like routine, the Fact Sheet was updated to inform the public about our unofficial relationship with Taiwan,” said a spokesman for the Foreign Ministry. The spokesman added that the United States is still committed to its “One China Policy” – a line that is still specified in the updated FACT Sheet.

Under the so -called “One China Policy”, the United States recognizes the People’s Republic as the only legitimate government of China. It also recognizes the position of Beijing that Taiwan is part of China, but has never accepted the Communist Party of the Chinese Party on the island.

“The United States is obliged to preserve peace and stability in the Taiwan road. We reject all one -sided changes to the status quo from both sides. “The spokesman said.

The wording of the independence of Taiwan was also removed from the US State Department website in 2022 to restore only a month later.

In a statement to CNN, the Foreign Minister of Taiwan, Lin Chia-Lung, welcomed the website change and said that his content reflected “support and positive attitude towards relationships between the USA-Taiwan”.

The most recent fact that Washington will continue to support the sensible participation of Taiwan in international organizations, including membership, “if necessary”. It was previously announced that Washington will continue to support Taiwan’s membership in international organizations, “if statehood is not a prerequisite”, according to the central news agency Taiwan, which first reported on the change in the wording.

Beijing under XI Jinping, China’s most assertive leader in a generation, has tried to isolate Taiwan economically, militarily and diplomatically, including preventing Taiwanese membership in important global committees.

Last week, two US marine ships sailed in the first such mission by the Taiwan road since Trump took office and an angry reaction from China’s military, which accused the US campaign, “to send the wrong signals and increase security risks” .