Which bear freenagent do you want to see newly signed, but seems unlikely?

The Chicago Bears currently have 31 Free Agents (details here). Part four of our latest WCG roundtables is …

Who is the only bear you would like to go under contract that seems unlikely?

Jacob Infante: I admit to be a larger Teven Jenkins fan than the average bear fan. I know that he had a reasonable share of injury concerns, and I think his contract should have a slight discount to have missed the planned time. Nevertheless, he is an above -average starting guard that plays on a very high level with the persistence that you want in a starting guard. I do not think that Chicago is expanding him because of his injury, and I can’t help but remember the trading rumors and Rocky Start Ryan Poles that he had risen. Jenkins will get a large contract somewhere and will definitely earn it. I just don’t think this deal comes from the bears.

Ryan Droste: It has to be Teven Jenkins. As thin as with OL, the additional depth it offers is valuable. Obviously, Jenkins could never stay healthy. But when he’s out there, it is damn good. I am sure that he wants to be paid, but if he is open to a team -friendly deal at all, I would deduct the deduction.

TJ Starman: Teven Jenkins. I only love Teven, I want him to be successful and I want it to be primarily in Chicago. That seems to be a long shot because of his injury history, and it is probably not in the best interest of the team to use this kind of chance, but I would still love a scenario in which this works.

Bryan Orenchuk: Teven Jenkins. Mainly because he probably collects a good amount on the market and I don’t want to pay too much to him, but if he would agree to bring a team -friendly agreement back, and at the same time bring Trey Smith /Kevin Zeitler and Drew Dalman /Ryan Kelly and a long -term solution At LG in the first three rounds, I would be enthusiastic about our OL.

Aaron Leming: The way things fit with Teven Jenkins in Chicago will never rub me wrong. It felt like he was a disadvantage from the beginning of his rookie year, but then it felt as if the new regime had come in and they got out on the wrong foot. When Jenkins is on the field, it is damn good. The problem is that his injury issues followed him in Chicago every four years. I completely understand why they go to a mutual separation, but I wish things could have been different.

Mongo peanut: Teven Jenkins. It is unlikely because he is a player who is probably more valued by a team than his current team. I think Jenkins is a very good player, but in view of his history of injury and the frustrations in connection with contract extensions, I would circled him as much as possible.

Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.: I pointed this out yesterday, but I would love it if Teven stays Jenkins. Injuries are a problem, but that should also keep his offer price a little reasonable. However, only one team will need to get over the top to pay the potential, and the bank for the injuries that are unlucky. The bears said they were checked a contract this off -season, so they never know it. Nevertheless, Jenkins, who have been rejected again, would have to come with a rookie wachmann to take part in competitions.

Josh Sunderbuch: Maybe Keenan Allen? I think he is a good player who adds the offenses, but I just see no reason for him to take less money to share the ball with bogs, odunze and kmet.

Erik Duerrwaechter: I assume I would like to see how Keenan stays for longer than a year, but he is probably looking for a larger deal and greater security as a top option of a team in reception game.

Now it’s your turn. Which bear freenagent do you want to see newly signed, but seems unlikely?